Showing posts with label American. Show all posts
Showing posts with label American. Show all posts

Monday, November 19, 2007

Torn Between Two Nations - My Love Story.

Torn Between Two Nations - My Love Story


I am a GAM (Gay Asian Male) from Singapore who has fallen in love with a GWM (Gay White Male) from the United States.

I am 34 and he is 49. In spite of our significant age difference, our relationship is not what most people would perceive it to be. I truly love him just the way he is. There isn't a day that I have stopped loving him. It is a relationship that sustains the longest test of time, albeit a long distance love. I painted a beautiful picture of us watching the sunset together at Houston, Texas one day when we both grow old. I will be sitting close to his frail body and holding on to his arm. The tattoo on that arm - R.E.D, which is the acronym of his name will be as wrinkled and dull as his skin. But that day will never come. We broke up in September 2007. We didn't break up because we didn't love each other anymore. We didn't break up because of third party. We broke up because I am a Singaporean and he is an American. We broke up because of our difference in nationality. We broke up because of the distance between us we cannot bridge. The immigration law in our country owes us big time.

Singapore is a highly conservative country. Every gay man as far as Europe and the U.S. knows that there is no hope for homosexuals in Singapore. The recent repeal 377A campaign that failed speaks much of our legislation and our people.To my dismay, there is no hope for me either in the Land of Freedom. I blame myself for not finding out more about immigration law and the right of same sex marriage in the U.S. I only learned about them when my boyfriend told me that our relationship was not going to work becasue the United States neither allows their citizens to sponsor their same sex partners for immigration benefits nor recognizes same sex marriage for immigration purposes. Although there are other options to legalise my stay in the U.S., they ain't helpful to me. With a Diploma and a resume of an executive, no employer in the U.S. would sponsor me without a professional practice. Obtaining a student visa may be viable but education in the U.S. is expensive. Seeking asylum will not work because the Singapore Government does not prosecute gay relationship or gay as an individual. Winning diversity visa lottery is a one million chance that won't salvage my relationship. Out of desperation, I considered a fraudulent marriage with the opposite sex in exchange for my green card. But I gave the idea up. It will be a silly move. I might be able to stay in the U.S. but probably behind bar awaiting deportation. Regrettably, same-sex marriage is not even a way out. Under the Canadian options, my boyfriend and I may be granted permanent residency. In other word, he would have to choose between me or his family, friends and career in the U.S. I am prepared to give up mine but I do not expect the same from him. Love is unconditional: I want to be with him and I am prepared to sacrifice. But I have no chance at all.

For most of us - gays or lebsians - who have formed long distance relationships with Americans, same-sex marriage is our only hope to remain in the United States. Denying us the right that binational heterosexual married couples enjoyed is unjust. Marriage is a union of two persons who are ready to commit in a life-long partnership regardless of genders. If the right accorded to binational matrimony is recognised, why is it overlooked between binational homosexual married couples? Shouldn't marriage be based on love, and love is universal across races and nationalities? Just look at how Americans are helping the poor in the third-world countries. How about applying the same concept of compassion to binational same-sex couples before breaking us up? Where is the love? The Black Eyed Peas questioned that in the same titled song, 'Where is the Love' . If love between two persons is governed by religion, and religion in turn becomes a political tool for the Federal Government, then withholding the right of same-sex marriages is a decision made without any consideration of humanity. The U.S. Immigration law discriminates against same-sex union in defense of American traditional family values. Consider the Republicans who advocate such values but among them, there are hypocrites who engage in same-sex affairs. How right can these self-proclaimed moral police be justified in sealing the fates of binational homosexual couples? Banning same-sex partner of an American citizen from staying in the United States is an act of cruelty to human race. Tearing binational couples apart undermines our diplomatic understanding for the country.

Falling in love with a foreigner is more than about the person; it is also about knowing the country where we come from. The homepage of my IE browser is set to Yahoo! U.S. and not Yahoo! Singapore. The reason is obvious : I want to know what's happening in the U.S. I love my boyfriend and the country he lives in. I want to be attuned to the American way of life, hoping that one day I will be a part of it. I want to contribute to U.S. economy, of which, I can enjoy with my boyfriend and fellow American friends. Sadly, the Federal Government overlooks the economic value subsisting in same-sex marriages. Breaking up binational same-sex couples forces their very own people to leave the country, thus migrating their skills to competing countries. I wonder if the government has read about the pink economy identified by Richard Florida. Driving talents away from the United States is not driving up its GDP. The voices of the United States seem to say, "leave American gays alone. Go and date gays from the 16 nations that allow their citizens to sponsor their same sex partners for immigration benefits."

My 3-year long distance relationship was broken up because our future is bleak. He couldn't find a job in Singapore and neither could I find one in the United States. I admit that we haven't done enough to salvage our relationship but there is only so much we could do. If the same right enjoyed by straight binational married couples is extended to us, he would have already married me. My wound is still fresh as I am writing this.


Everyday, there are same-sex couples from various countries breaking up with their American partners because of the anti-gay immigration law. I found hope in Immigration Equality, a national organization that works to push the Uniting American Families Act (UAFA). I urge that the UAFA be passed on the ground of human rights. The torment of binational same-sex couples ought to end. Whether or not the UAFA becomes law, do not give up your American partner. True love never surrenders only if we try.

We shouldn't let policy dictates who we love. That's the responsbility of our heart.

-------------------------------------------------------

Support my To Sydney with Love Fund. Read More>>>




Monday, October 08, 2007

Give me the Green Card but Spare me the Gun

Another young man snapped and took law in his own hand. 20-year old, Tyler Peterson (inset: left) stormed into a Duplex in Crandon, North Wisconsin and killed 6 teenagers in a rampant shooting. This happened on Sunday - a day after my friends had advised me against relocation to the U.S. Their reason being the Land of Freedom is unsafe.

A failed attempt to reconcile with his old girlfriend invited mockery from guests who were present at that house for a pizza party during the school's reunion weekend. He was called a "worthless pig." This enraged Peterson to retrieve the AR-15 rifle from his car outside and marched into the house firing 30 rounds that killed everyone except one who is critically injured. Hours later, he was found dead after fleeing the crime scene when the Swat team nailed him. Whether he shot himself or died in an exchange of gunfire with the armed police, the authority is not revealing yet. Peterson's killing raised many eyebrows: how could a sheriff's deputy and a part-time police officer possibly commit such heinous crime? Who could have guessed that a 'non-trouble maker' as his good friend described him would become a bersek gunman? Can you tell from his photo that the cherubic face smiling at you is capable of killing? I can't. News leaked that apparently he did not undergo psychological screening piror to his acceptance as a law enforcement officer.

This brings me back to my friends' comment. In a country where gun control is luke warm, It is better to get a good insurance scheme than to worry when will I be gunned down. According to handgunlaw.us, most States allow gun ownership provided that the applicants satisfy the minimum age requirement of which varies from States to States (inset: left). Most States require the applicants to be at least 18 or 21; only Missouri has the exception - 23.

The Wisconsin's tragedy is the 2nd rampant shooting after the VirginiaTech massacre on April 16, 2007. 23-year old Korean, Seung-Hui Cho killed 33 people at the campus before shooting himself. This marked one of the deadliest school shooting in U.S. history. The minimum age to apply for Carrying Concealed Weapons (CCW) for private citizens in Virginia is 21 which Cho is eligible for. Although Wisconsin is denied the right to CCW, Peterson, is however, a qualified law enforcement officer. Sadly the case.

Reported by Reuters and quoted sources from National Rifle Association (NRA), an estimated 34 percent of the citizens in the United States owns firearms and 200 million firearms are in private hands. Considering that private resales of guns is largely unregulated and that the U.S. popluation to be 300 million, it is highly possible that in the most densely populated State such as New Jersey, 6 households out of 10 are likely to own a gun.

Singapore has no history of rampant shootings. Primarily, possession of firearms by citizens is a criminal offence that warrants caning and imprisonment. The terrors that struck the heartland so far were cases of soldiers who went missing with rifles and bullets. The first case was in 1984 and another happened recently last month. Singaporeans at large are either too tame or too sane to commit massacre. I can safely generalise that 99.9 percent of the population is capable of shooting from water guns; the 0.01 percent may be potential gunmen but they have a 99.9 percent chance of not finding a gun in the first place. So what's my take - Singapore or U.S?

Give me the Green Card but spare me the gun.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wisconsin gunman Tyler Peterson 'snapped over rebuff by ex-girlfriend' - Times Online


Bananation Condolences to the families and vicitim of Virginia Tech Massacre.

Tuesday, April 17, 2007


April 15 was my birthday.

Just as I was contemplating a postmortem thoughts of my birthday on April 16, 33 innocent lives were lost in a mass shooting at the Virginia Tech's campus. When I read the news on Yahoo! this evening, I decided not to blog about my birthday thoughts but to devote the time for a better cause.

I am not writing to express hatre for the South Korean gunman nor to stir up racial prejudice. Neither am I writing a lengthy commentary on U.S. gun laws nor the gunman's state of mind.

I firmly believe that any atrocious man-made acts or natural catastrophes, the loss of innocent lives, regardless if they are Americans, Indonesians or other nationalities, is the loss of innocent lives of our fellow brothers and sisters on Mother Earth. Therefore, in view of the Virginia Tech's shooting, I urge all countries that legalise private ownership of guns to examine such laws thoroughly and conscientiously.

Banning gun ownership from the individuals is not a 100% foolproof solution because a policeman/soldier can go berserk when we least expect. However, such measure will help to control access to dangerous weapons and reduce the death count caused by deranged gunmen.

At the present moment, please join my humble effort in reshaping the U.S. guns culture by commenting on this issue. If the comments grow beyond 500, it will be brought to the attention of the U.S. Embassy in Singapore for its onwards transmission to the Congress.

Thank you.
Bananation